Current Gallery: Post-Edwardian & Modern / postedwardianmodern208

Use the scrollbar to explore costumes in this gallery or select a time period above to visit a different gallery.

3 1685 80
    • Paramount Pictures

    Angel

    1937

    Costume seen on Marlene Dietrich as Maria Barker

    • Paramount Pictures

    Midnight

    1939

    Costume seen on Mary Astor as Helene Flammarion

    • Paramount Pictures

    A Night at Earl Carroll’s

    1940

    Costume seen on Rose Hobart as Ramona Lisa

    • Paramount Pictures

    The Errand Boy

    1961

    Costume seen on Felicia Atkins as Serina

    • Paramount Pictures

    A New Kind of Love

    1963

    Costume seen on an uncredited actress as a model

    • Paramount Pictures
    • Metropolitan Museum of Art

    MET Exhibition - “Hollywood Costume- Glarmour! Glitter! Romance!"

    1985

    Costume seen on Costume on display

    • CBS Entertainment Productions
    • Columbia Broadcasting System

    My Wicked, Wicked Ways

    1985

    Costume seen on Barbara Hershey as Lili Damita

Additional Images

About the Costume

Larry McQueen, owner of The Collection of Motion Picture Costume Design has sent me a lovely sighting filled with detailed information. 

In 1936, Travis Banton, head designer at Paramount Studios, began work on the last film he would design for his favorite clotheshorse, Marlene Dietrich. The duo had worked closely together on all her films at Paramount and created the “Dietrich style”– a look of lavish, smoldering, hard-edged sophistication that was instrumental in creating the Dietrich legend.

 Dietrich had one final film to complete her contract at Paramount and was cast in a typical Dietrich vehicle Angel, a sophisticated Lubitsch melodrama with her in the role of an ignored wife of means who has an affair with her husband’s friend. Banton designed the most opulent dress he had ever created for the star for the under-five-minute opera sequence and preceding scenes in the film. The ensemble was to become known as the “Faberge” gown and consisted of a fitted long-sleeve bodice with peplum, a matching long skirt with train, and a six-foot stole bordered with sable. The fabric was solidly embroidered with gold beads, pearls, rhinestones, gold bullion, gold sequins, and faux ruby and emerald stones in geometric designs. According to W. Robert Levine in his book “In A Glamorous Fashion,” the costume was cost-listed on the wardrobe records at $8,000.00, an exorbitant price in the post-depression era and a price that would be over $100,000.00 by today’s standards. The expense must have caused stirrings in Paramount’s upper management at a time when the government was asking the studios to scale back the unnecessary lavishness in costume design. Banton himself once said it was the most expensive gown he had ever designed.

 The ensemble is given credit in many film costume books as the most spectacular gown ever created. Diana Vreeland, the one-time curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, said of the costume in the book “Hollywood Costume– Glamour! Glitter! Romance!” “When I think of detail, I think of Travis Banton’s marvelous beaded dress for Marlene Dietrich in Angel—like a million grains of golden caviar. That is one of the most beautiful dresses ever…”. Margaret J. Bailey, in her book Those Glorious Glamour Years, describes the dress “It was simple in lines, of Persian design, and looked like a piece of woven jewelry…” and “… caused no little trauma on the set when producers refused to give it to Dietrich for her private wardrobe.”

Dietrich had loved the gown and asked the studio if she could keep it. It is said she was so angry about being refused by the company she helped save that she stormed off the set. The incident no doubt added to her disharmonious departure from the studio. She left the studio and did not return until a decade later. Acquiring gowns and props from her films- by whatever means- was a general practice of Ms. Dietrich. After her death, The German Film Archive Foundation (die Stiftung Deutsche Kinemathek) and The Berlin Film Museum acquired her estate in 1993, which consisted of five different storehouses in Europe and the USA. In the collection were thousands of items from her career, including fifty of her most famous film gowns. Her daughter, Maria Riva, once told the curator of the Frankfurt Film Museum that her mother was always in constant fear the studios would someday try to take back her collection and had kept the fact of its existence well hidden.

Paramount, however, retained the piece and began to put it to use. Re-using costumes was a common practice by studios to maintain an opulent look to secondary and background characters without the expense of making new ones. It is unknown exactly how many films the Dietrich gown was used in, but from the photos found, it is obvious it was put to work and underwent many transformations. Mary Astor wore it without the stole on the set of Midnight, 1939. The front was reworked and worn by Rose Hobart in the film A Night at Earl Carrolls, 1940. It was used in publicity photos for Loraine Day circa 1944. With the sleeves removed, the stole was added to the front of the bodice as draping when it was was worn by Felicia Atkins in The Errand Boy, 1961. The stole was cut in half to be used as a turban and worn with a sleeveless altered bodice by a model in A New Kind of Love, 1963. In 1974, the bodice was put back together and used by Diana Vreeland in the MET exhibition of film fashion, and in 1985, the gown and stole were returned to their original configuration and worn by Barbara Hershey in the TV movie My Wicked Wicked Ways.

With all the different uses, the pieces took a beating. Many of the “re-workings” were fast and crude, and some of the attempts to repair the gown involved covering damaged areas with large gold sequins. One previous ‘restoration’ involved applying glue to areas and pushing the beads back together, and letting them harden. The fine chiffon backing was weak and starting to split, and the patterns were separating. The costume was so fragile that it could never be worn again, but it is amazing the pieces stayed together.

In December of 1990, Paramount put the gown up for auction at Christie’s New York as part of a larger collection of “star wardrobes.” Larry McQueen and his late business partner, Bill Thomas, who were respected experts in the field of film costumes and had compiled one of the finest collections of the medium under the name “The Collection,” were retained to help inventory, authenticate and price the collection. They were overwhelmed to see, what they believed to be, the most exquisite film costume ever created. They successfully purchased it for approximately $23,000.00, one of the highest prices at the auction. However, as excited as they were to own the gown, the reality of its condition soon set in. Due to the age of the garment, poor storage, and multiple alterations, it could never be dressed on a mannequin because it would not support its own extreme weight.

 In 1999, four years after Bill Thomas died, Larry McQueen began the process of restoring the costume. Museum experts in preservation and restoration were consulted, and much debate occurred as to whether the integrity of the gown (however poor that integrity was) should be tampered with. Mr. McQueen finally decided that instead of leaving it as it was- a box of un-showable beads- the ensemble should be restored. Getson/Eastern Embroidery, who was then owned by Annie Denderian, was approached with working on the gown. The firm had worked on the original costume and, luckily, had many of the beads, sequins, and stones used on the original construction.

But, restoration of the garment proved far more difficult than planned. Even though the gown had only taken weeks to create, it would take years to restore. Every inch of the beadwork would have to be attached to new chiffon backing, and the patterns pulled into shape and lightly tacked. Then the patterns had to be permanently hand stitched, replacing any missing stones or beads. Previous poor repairs would have to be removed. Missing areas or areas that had been glued would have to be replaced. Many of the original silk threads that attached the beads were breaking and would have to be reinforced with new silk thread. The stole, which had been cut in half and then stacked on top of itself and re-sewn, had to be taken apart, attached to a new backing, and the beading attached and corrected. Photographs of Dietrich wearing the costume were enlarged to determine what was an original pattern and what had been changed. Luckily, the patterns did repeat themselves, so where a pattern was missing, a template of an existing pattern was made to re-create the missing one. The task would involve going inch by inch and would involve thousands of hours and great expense. But, determined to see the gown restored, Larry McQueen had the work begun.

The gown could not be taken apart and beaded flat as it was originally constructed, so a special frame with a sling had to be constructed to allow access to the inside of the garment to work from the front and the back of the fabric. Beads and sequins that had to be removed were sorted and reattached to the same location if possible. Only a four-inch area could be worked on at one time, and each area was photographed before and after to document the work done. The project was daunting.

The entire fabric of the costume is composed of repeating geometric shapes, somewhat like a paisley pattern. Each shape is outlined with small pearls or faceted rhinestones. Beads, pearls, or sequins in different combinations fill the center portions of the design. Throughout are patterns that contain a small gridwork of bullion threading, and each square is filled with small pearls, sequins, or a combination of sequins and gold beads. The background is of solid gold rocaille beads, and the gown is sporadically studded with emerald and red glass beads. Literally, millions of beads were used to create the fabric of the ensemble.

After one year, only the bodice was approaching completion, and most of the work was done by Annie Denderian. But the expense was mounting, and it was becoming impossible to find qualified people who had the patience and time to spend on the garment. Mr. McQueen decided that if the costume were to be completed, he would have to take over the bulk of the hands-on restoration. Having the background and, more importantly, the motivation to see the gown completed, he was mentored by Ms. Denderian. He learned and perfected the techniques to painstakingly reattach the patterns and began work on the dress. 

Almost one year to the date of beginning the work, working faithfully five to eight hours a day, the skirt and the stole were completed. To add strength, bias tape reinforcing and a new silk chiffon lining was added by the costume house of John David Ridge, and the stole was re-bordered by using an existing sable by Judith Moss at LA Fur Center.

McQueen stated that he probably would have reconsidered restoring the gown had he known the time, patience, and expense it was going to take, but then quickly added that he would have done it anyway. It was just too important. In working that closely with the piece, McQueen was amazed at how in touch you get with the people who originally created the garment (a process difficult to understand unless you have restored someone else’s creation). You could tell when someone was having a bad day and cutting corners. You could tell when someone was struck with genius. You could see the differences in workmanship and technique between the various beaders. You could see the time spent on details in areas that no one would ever see. You become very close to the garment and understand it.

The gown is truly a testament to the artistry of early Hollywood. Mr. McQueen is confident the care, attention, and over 3000 hours spent in its restoration would make its original creators proud. He hopes that if he leaves any legacy in the field of film costumes, one of his main accomplishments will be that the “Faberge gown” survives in the splendor in which it was originally created and will be shown and appreciated for generations to come.

 

About the Costume

Have you seen this gown somewhere else? Do you need to be given credit for this sighting? Do you have corrections, additions or changes you would like to make?

Have you ever watched a film and noticed a character walk by in a gown that you just know you’ve seen before? Recycled Movie Costumes is dedicated to documenting the life of a costume through its various appearances on film and television.

Additional Images

About the Costume

Larry McQueen, owner of The Collection of Motion Picture Costume Design has sent me a lovely sighting filled with detailed information. 

In 1936, Travis Banton, head designer at Paramount Studios, began work on the last film he would design for his favorite clotheshorse, Marlene Dietrich. The duo had worked closely together on all her films at Paramount and created the “Dietrich style”– a look of lavish, smoldering, hard-edged sophistication that was instrumental in creating the Dietrich legend.

 Dietrich had one final film to complete her contract at Paramount and was cast in a typical Dietrich vehicle Angel, a sophisticated Lubitsch melodrama with her in the role of an ignored wife of means who has an affair with her husband’s friend. Banton designed the most opulent dress he had ever created for the star for the under-five-minute opera sequence and preceding scenes in the film. The ensemble was to become known as the “Faberge” gown and consisted of a fitted long-sleeve bodice with peplum, a matching long skirt with train, and a six-foot stole bordered with sable. The fabric was solidly embroidered with gold beads, pearls, rhinestones, gold bullion, gold sequins, and faux ruby and emerald stones in geometric designs. According to W. Robert Levine in his book “In A Glamorous Fashion,” the costume was cost-listed on the wardrobe records at $8,000.00, an exorbitant price in the post-depression era and a price that would be over $100,000.00 by today’s standards. The expense must have caused stirrings in Paramount’s upper management at a time when the government was asking the studios to scale back the unnecessary lavishness in costume design. Banton himself once said it was the most expensive gown he had ever designed.

 The ensemble is given credit in many film costume books as the most spectacular gown ever created. Diana Vreeland, the one-time curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, said of the costume in the book “Hollywood Costume– Glamour! Glitter! Romance!” “When I think of detail, I think of Travis Banton’s marvelous beaded dress for Marlene Dietrich in Angel—like a million grains of golden caviar. That is one of the most beautiful dresses ever…”. Margaret J. Bailey, in her book Those Glorious Glamour Years, describes the dress “It was simple in lines, of Persian design, and looked like a piece of woven jewelry…” and “… caused no little trauma on the set when producers refused to give it to Dietrich for her private wardrobe.”

Dietrich had loved the gown and asked the studio if she could keep it. It is said she was so angry about being refused by the company she helped save that she stormed off the set. The incident no doubt added to her disharmonious departure from the studio. She left the studio and did not return until a decade later. Acquiring gowns and props from her films- by whatever means- was a general practice of Ms. Dietrich. After her death, The German Film Archive Foundation (die Stiftung Deutsche Kinemathek) and The Berlin Film Museum acquired her estate in 1993, which consisted of five different storehouses in Europe and the USA. In the collection were thousands of items from her career, including fifty of her most famous film gowns. Her daughter, Maria Riva, once told the curator of the Frankfurt Film Museum that her mother was always in constant fear the studios would someday try to take back her collection and had kept the fact of its existence well hidden.

Paramount, however, retained the piece and began to put it to use. Re-using costumes was a common practice by studios to maintain an opulent look to secondary and background characters without the expense of making new ones. It is unknown exactly how many films the Dietrich gown was used in, but from the photos found, it is obvious it was put to work and underwent many transformations. Mary Astor wore it without the stole on the set of Midnight, 1939. The front was reworked and worn by Rose Hobart in the film A Night at Earl Carrolls, 1940. It was used in publicity photos for Loraine Day circa 1944. With the sleeves removed, the stole was added to the front of the bodice as draping when it was was worn by Felicia Atkins in The Errand Boy, 1961. The stole was cut in half to be used as a turban and worn with a sleeveless altered bodice by a model in A New Kind of Love, 1963. In 1974, the bodice was put back together and used by Diana Vreeland in the MET exhibition of film fashion, and in 1985, the gown and stole were returned to their original configuration and worn by Barbara Hershey in the TV movie My Wicked Wicked Ways.

With all the different uses, the pieces took a beating. Many of the “re-workings” were fast and crude, and some of the attempts to repair the gown involved covering damaged areas with large gold sequins. One previous ‘restoration’ involved applying glue to areas and pushing the beads back together, and letting them harden. The fine chiffon backing was weak and starting to split, and the patterns were separating. The costume was so fragile that it could never be worn again, but it is amazing the pieces stayed together.

In December of 1990, Paramount put the gown up for auction at Christie’s New York as part of a larger collection of “star wardrobes.” Larry McQueen and his late business partner, Bill Thomas, who were respected experts in the field of film costumes and had compiled one of the finest collections of the medium under the name “The Collection,” were retained to help inventory, authenticate and price the collection. They were overwhelmed to see, what they believed to be, the most exquisite film costume ever created. They successfully purchased it for approximately $23,000.00, one of the highest prices at the auction. However, as excited as they were to own the gown, the reality of its condition soon set in. Due to the age of the garment, poor storage, and multiple alterations, it could never be dressed on a mannequin because it would not support its own extreme weight.

 In 1999, four years after Bill Thomas died, Larry McQueen began the process of restoring the costume. Museum experts in preservation and restoration were consulted, and much debate occurred as to whether the integrity of the gown (however poor that integrity was) should be tampered with. Mr. McQueen finally decided that instead of leaving it as it was- a box of un-showable beads- the ensemble should be restored. Getson/Eastern Embroidery, who was then owned by Annie Denderian, was approached with working on the gown. The firm had worked on the original costume and, luckily, had many of the beads, sequins, and stones used on the original construction.

But, restoration of the garment proved far more difficult than planned. Even though the gown had only taken weeks to create, it would take years to restore. Every inch of the beadwork would have to be attached to new chiffon backing, and the patterns pulled into shape and lightly tacked. Then the patterns had to be permanently hand stitched, replacing any missing stones or beads. Previous poor repairs would have to be removed. Missing areas or areas that had been glued would have to be replaced. Many of the original silk threads that attached the beads were breaking and would have to be reinforced with new silk thread. The stole, which had been cut in half and then stacked on top of itself and re-sewn, had to be taken apart, attached to a new backing, and the beading attached and corrected. Photographs of Dietrich wearing the costume were enlarged to determine what was an original pattern and what had been changed. Luckily, the patterns did repeat themselves, so where a pattern was missing, a template of an existing pattern was made to re-create the missing one. The task would involve going inch by inch and would involve thousands of hours and great expense. But, determined to see the gown restored, Larry McQueen had the work begun.

The gown could not be taken apart and beaded flat as it was originally constructed, so a special frame with a sling had to be constructed to allow access to the inside of the garment to work from the front and the back of the fabric. Beads and sequins that had to be removed were sorted and reattached to the same location if possible. Only a four-inch area could be worked on at one time, and each area was photographed before and after to document the work done. The project was daunting.

The entire fabric of the costume is composed of repeating geometric shapes, somewhat like a paisley pattern. Each shape is outlined with small pearls or faceted rhinestones. Beads, pearls, or sequins in different combinations fill the center portions of the design. Throughout are patterns that contain a small gridwork of bullion threading, and each square is filled with small pearls, sequins, or a combination of sequins and gold beads. The background is of solid gold rocaille beads, and the gown is sporadically studded with emerald and red glass beads. Literally, millions of beads were used to create the fabric of the ensemble.

After one year, only the bodice was approaching completion, and most of the work was done by Annie Denderian. But the expense was mounting, and it was becoming impossible to find qualified people who had the patience and time to spend on the garment. Mr. McQueen decided that if the costume were to be completed, he would have to take over the bulk of the hands-on restoration. Having the background and, more importantly, the motivation to see the gown completed, he was mentored by Ms. Denderian. He learned and perfected the techniques to painstakingly reattach the patterns and began work on the dress. 

Almost one year to the date of beginning the work, working faithfully five to eight hours a day, the skirt and the stole were completed. To add strength, bias tape reinforcing and a new silk chiffon lining was added by the costume house of John David Ridge, and the stole was re-bordered by using an existing sable by Judith Moss at LA Fur Center.

McQueen stated that he probably would have reconsidered restoring the gown had he known the time, patience, and expense it was going to take, but then quickly added that he would have done it anyway. It was just too important. In working that closely with the piece, McQueen was amazed at how in touch you get with the people who originally created the garment (a process difficult to understand unless you have restored someone else’s creation). You could tell when someone was having a bad day and cutting corners. You could tell when someone was struck with genius. You could see the differences in workmanship and technique between the various beaders. You could see the time spent on details in areas that no one would ever see. You become very close to the garment and understand it.

The gown is truly a testament to the artistry of early Hollywood. Mr. McQueen is confident the care, attention, and over 3000 hours spent in its restoration would make its original creators proud. He hopes that if he leaves any legacy in the field of film costumes, one of his main accomplishments will be that the “Faberge gown” survives in the splendor in which it was originally created and will be shown and appreciated for generations to come.

 

Larry McQueen, owner of The Collection of Motion Picture Costume Design has sent me a lovely sighting filled with detailed information. 

In 1936, Travis Banton, head designer at Paramount Studios, began work on the last film he would design for his favorite clotheshorse, Marlene Dietrich. The duo had worked closely together on all her films at Paramount and created the “Dietrich style”– a look of lavish, smoldering, hard-edged sophistication that was instrumental in creating the Dietrich legend.

 Dietrich had one final film to complete her contract at Paramount and was cast in a typical Dietrich vehicle Angel, a sophisticated Lubitsch melodrama with her in the role of an ignored wife of means who has an affair with her husband’s friend. Banton designed the most opulent dress he had ever created for the star for the under-five-minute opera sequence and preceding scenes in the film. The ensemble was to become known as the “Faberge” gown and consisted of a fitted long-sleeve bodice with peplum, a matching long skirt with train, and a six-foot stole bordered with sable. The fabric was solidly embroidered with gold beads, pearls, rhinestones, gold bullion, gold sequins, and faux ruby and emerald stones in geometric designs. According to W. Robert Levine in his book “In A Glamorous Fashion,” the costume was cost-listed on the wardrobe records at $8,000.00, an exorbitant price in the post-depression era and a price that would be over $100,000.00 by today’s standards. The expense must have caused stirrings in Paramount’s upper management at a time when the government was asking the studios to scale back the unnecessary lavishness in costume design. Banton himself once said it was the most expensive gown he had ever designed.

 The ensemble is given credit in many film costume books as the most spectacular gown ever created. Diana Vreeland, the one-time curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, said of the costume in the book “Hollywood Costume– Glamour! Glitter! Romance!” “When I think of detail, I think of Travis Banton’s marvelous beaded dress for Marlene Dietrich in Angel—like a million grains of golden caviar. That is one of the most beautiful dresses ever…”. Margaret J. Bailey, in her book Those Glorious Glamour Years, describes the dress “It was simple in lines, of Persian design, and looked like a piece of woven jewelry…” and “… caused no little trauma on the set when producers refused to give it to Dietrich for her private wardrobe.”

Dietrich had loved the gown and asked the studio if she could keep it. It is said she was so angry about being refused by the company she helped save that she stormed off the set. The incident no doubt added to her disharmonious departure from the studio. She left the studio and did not return until a decade later. Acquiring gowns and props from her films- by whatever means- was a general practice of Ms. Dietrich. After her death, The German Film Archive Foundation (die Stiftung Deutsche Kinemathek) and The Berlin Film Museum acquired her estate in 1993, which consisted of five different storehouses in Europe and the USA. In the collection were thousands of items from her career, including fifty of her most famous film gowns. Her daughter, Maria Riva, once told the curator of the Frankfurt Film Museum that her mother was always in constant fear the studios would someday try to take back her collection and had kept the fact of its existence well hidden.

Paramount, however, retained the piece and began to put it to use. Re-using costumes was a common practice by studios to maintain an opulent look to secondary and background characters without the expense of making new ones. It is unknown exactly how many films the Dietrich gown was used in, but from the photos found, it is obvious it was put to work and underwent many transformations. Mary Astor wore it without the stole on the set of Midnight, 1939. The front was reworked and worn by Rose Hobart in the film A Night at Earl Carrolls, 1940. It was used in publicity photos for Loraine Day circa 1944. With the sleeves removed, the stole was added to the front of the bodice as draping when it was was worn by Felicia Atkins in The Errand Boy, 1961. The stole was cut in half to be used as a turban and worn with a sleeveless altered bodice by a model in A New Kind of Love, 1963. In 1974, the bodice was put back together and used by Diana Vreeland in the MET exhibition of film fashion, and in 1985, the gown and stole were returned to their original configuration and worn by Barbara Hershey in the TV movie My Wicked Wicked Ways.

With all the different uses, the pieces took a beating. Many of the “re-workings” were fast and crude, and some of the attempts to repair the gown involved covering damaged areas with large gold sequins. One previous ‘restoration’ involved applying glue to areas and pushing the beads back together, and letting them harden. The fine chiffon backing was weak and starting to split, and the patterns were separating. The costume was so fragile that it could never be worn again, but it is amazing the pieces stayed together.

In December of 1990, Paramount put the gown up for auction at Christie’s New York as part of a larger collection of “star wardrobes.” Larry McQueen and his late business partner, Bill Thomas, who were respected experts in the field of film costumes and had compiled one of the finest collections of the medium under the name “The Collection,” were retained to help inventory, authenticate and price the collection. They were overwhelmed to see, what they believed to be, the most exquisite film costume ever created. They successfully purchased it for approximately $23,000.00, one of the highest prices at the auction. However, as excited as they were to own the gown, the reality of its condition soon set in. Due to the age of the garment, poor storage, and multiple alterations, it could never be dressed on a mannequin because it would not support its own extreme weight.

 In 1999, four years after Bill Thomas died, Larry McQueen began the process of restoring the costume. Museum experts in preservation and restoration were consulted, and much debate occurred as to whether the integrity of the gown (however poor that integrity was) should be tampered with. Mr. McQueen finally decided that instead of leaving it as it was- a box of un-showable beads- the ensemble should be restored. Getson/Eastern Embroidery, who was then owned by Annie Denderian, was approached with working on the gown. The firm had worked on the original costume and, luckily, had many of the beads, sequins, and stones used on the original construction.

But, restoration of the garment proved far more difficult than planned. Even though the gown had only taken weeks to create, it would take years to restore. Every inch of the beadwork would have to be attached to new chiffon backing, and the patterns pulled into shape and lightly tacked. Then the patterns had to be permanently hand stitched, replacing any missing stones or beads. Previous poor repairs would have to be removed. Missing areas or areas that had been glued would have to be replaced. Many of the original silk threads that attached the beads were breaking and would have to be reinforced with new silk thread. The stole, which had been cut in half and then stacked on top of itself and re-sewn, had to be taken apart, attached to a new backing, and the beading attached and corrected. Photographs of Dietrich wearing the costume were enlarged to determine what was an original pattern and what had been changed. Luckily, the patterns did repeat themselves, so where a pattern was missing, a template of an existing pattern was made to re-create the missing one. The task would involve going inch by inch and would involve thousands of hours and great expense. But, determined to see the gown restored, Larry McQueen had the work begun.

The gown could not be taken apart and beaded flat as it was originally constructed, so a special frame with a sling had to be constructed to allow access to the inside of the garment to work from the front and the back of the fabric. Beads and sequins that had to be removed were sorted and reattached to the same location if possible. Only a four-inch area could be worked on at one time, and each area was photographed before and after to document the work done. The project was daunting.

The entire fabric of the costume is composed of repeating geometric shapes, somewhat like a paisley pattern. Each shape is outlined with small pearls or faceted rhinestones. Beads, pearls, or sequins in different combinations fill the center portions of the design. Throughout are patterns that contain a small gridwork of bullion threading, and each square is filled with small pearls, sequins, or a combination of sequins and gold beads. The background is of solid gold rocaille beads, and the gown is sporadically studded with emerald and red glass beads. Literally, millions of beads were used to create the fabric of the ensemble.

After one year, only the bodice was approaching completion, and most of the work was done by Annie Denderian. But the expense was mounting, and it was becoming impossible to find qualified people who had the patience and time to spend on the garment. Mr. McQueen decided that if the costume were to be completed, he would have to take over the bulk of the hands-on restoration. Having the background and, more importantly, the motivation to see the gown completed, he was mentored by Ms. Denderian. He learned and perfected the techniques to painstakingly reattach the patterns and began work on the dress. 

Almost one year to the date of beginning the work, working faithfully five to eight hours a day, the skirt and the stole were completed. To add strength, bias tape reinforcing and a new silk chiffon lining was added by the costume house of John David Ridge, and the stole was re-bordered by using an existing sable by Judith Moss at LA Fur Center.

McQueen stated that he probably would have reconsidered restoring the gown had he known the time, patience, and expense it was going to take, but then quickly added that he would have done it anyway. It was just too important. In working that closely with the piece, McQueen was amazed at how in touch you get with the people who originally created the garment (a process difficult to understand unless you have restored someone else’s creation). You could tell when someone was having a bad day and cutting corners. You could tell when someone was struck with genius. You could see the differences in workmanship and technique between the various beaders. You could see the time spent on details in areas that no one would ever see. You become very close to the garment and understand it.

The gown is truly a testament to the artistry of early Hollywood. Mr. McQueen is confident the care, attention, and over 3000 hours spent in its restoration would make its original creators proud. He hopes that if he leaves any legacy in the field of film costumes, one of his main accomplishments will be that the “Faberge gown” survives in the splendor in which it was originally created and will be shown and appreciated for generations to come.

 

Credits

Sighting Credit:
  • Larry McQueen: The Collection of Motion Picture Costume Design
Photos provided by:
Costume Designer:
  • Travis Banton

Disclaimer

All intellectual property rights vests with the owner of the copyrighted material. Recycled Movie Costumes is not copying, distributing and using these materials except for entertainment purposes only and deems itself to be protected under the regulations of mandatory law (such as the right to quote), unless otherwise stated for certain material. We are happy to take down any material that the copyright owner/trademark owner feels is a violation of their statutory right. Before proceeding with the legal measures, we request the alleged aggrieved to contact us at [email protected] for us to assist them with our cooperation.

The films/television shows/books and other media represented in the images on this website do not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of Recycled Movie Costumes. Said media may contain mature content. Viewer discretion is advised at all times.

Leave a Comment

Comment

Make an Edit

Do you have more information to add to this page?
Do you have a brand new costume to share? 

Comment