I agree about the necessity of proper support, and that the 2002 version is woefully unsupported in a period fashion. However, I am unconvinced that they are the same costume. The fabric of the one worn in 2002 appears to be a subtle tone-on-tone damask whereas the original from ’78 is clearly a very shiny and smooth (likely a weighty bridal satin) sans pattern of any kind like brocade or damask to the weave. It is just as likely that the pattern for the garment was replicated and made again as that it is the *same* gown, because the weave of the fabric itself is so different. That being said, it is *possible* (if it is actually the same costume) that the fabric was purposefully, uniformly, crinkle-finished and might even have been given a very pale tea bath to achieve a textured result vs the crisp appearance it had originally. It just appears to me to be the same costume pattern design but reproduced in an entirely different fabric, and that is not attributable to just lacking proper foundation/fit.
Use the scrollbar to explore costumes in this gallery or select a time period above to visit a different gallery.
-
Ancient &
Medieval -
Tudor &
Elizabethan -
Stuart &
Georgian -
Regency &
Romantic -
Victorian &
Edwardian -
Post Edwardian &
Modern -
Sci-Fi &
Fantasy - Accessories
- Props
- Undetermined
Use the scrollbar to explore costumes in this gallery or select a time period above to visit a different gallery.
3
1685
80

Costume Commentary
I agree about the necessity of proper support, and that the 2002 version is woefully unsupported in a period fashion. However, I am unconvinced that they are the same costume. The fabric of the one worn in 2002 appears to be a subtle tone-on-tone damask whereas the original from ’78 is clearly a very shiny and smooth (likely a weighty bridal satin) sans pattern of any kind like brocade or damask to the weave. It is just as likely that the pattern for the garment was replicated and made again as that it is the *same* gown, because the weave of the fabric itself is so different. That being said, it is *possible* (if it is actually the same costume) that the fabric was purposefully, uniformly, crinkle-finished and might even have been given a very pale tea bath to achieve a textured result vs the crisp appearance it had originally. It just appears to me to be the same costume pattern design but reproduced in an entirely different fabric, and that is not attributable to just lacking proper foundation/fit.
It’s the quality of the photos. James, who sent this contribution, has a career in this field and has access to these costumes through his work.
Oh, lovely! Thank you! I just adore this particular piece!
I’ve found this costume in another title. Here it is in Cribb: Invitation to a Dynamite Party (1981), worn by Jeananne Crowley as Rossanna McGee.